13 Inch Vs 15 Inch MacBook Professional
So you're seeking to purchase a MacBook Pro, but you face the question, Do I need the portability of a 13 inch OR the power of a 15 inch?
Now for reference, I'll be comparing the highest end stock 13 inch MacBook Pro in opposition to the bottom end stock 15 inch. What I imply by stock is there's no tweaks & no customization. You can stroll into the Apple Store, BestBuy and even go on Amazon and pick these models up.
So, like I mentioned, essentially the most appealing thing concerning the thirteen inch MacBook Pro 2017 Professional is the Type Factor. It's lighter, it's more compact and subsequently, it is simpler to maneuver around. Then you may have the 15 inch, which is heavier and perhaps a bit of less portable, however you are getting Desktop like Power.
So performance-clever this thirteen inch MacBook Pro has a 2.9GHz Dual Core i5 CPU that turbo boosts as much as 3.3GHz. The 15 inch alternatively has a 2.2GHz Quad Core i7 CPU that turbo boosts all the way as much as 3.4GHz.
So far as the RAM and Storage go the 13 inch has 8GB of RAM, 512GB flash storage, as the 15 inch has double the RAM however half the storage it means can clearly be configured. What cannot be configured though are the Graphics. The thirteen inch has Intel Iris Graphics 6100, then you've got Intel Iris Professional Graphics on the 15 inch.
Now when it comes to these Cores and people Graphics and the way they make difference in performance we'll get to that in a second, however I feel we first need to deal with the Display. Its size, decision and overall screen real estate.
The 13 inch MacBook Professional has a resolution of 2560 x 1600 whereas the 15 inch MacBook Professional has the resolution of 2880 x 1800. And when it comes to what these numbers really means every part is scaled, and if it wasn't Text and everything can be so small, it would be a nightmare to look at. So, the thirteen inch MacBook visually seems to be like 1280 x 800 whereas the 15 inch visually appears like 1440 x 900. Now past that every of these can be configured to provide you more screen real estate.
Subsequent what I did was bump up every MacBook Professional to the following scaling option which gave us more screen real estate. And what I had happening my laptop computer was a Full 1080p window playing in Final Cut Professional 10, and I was able to see how a lot more screen real estate I obtained on the 15 inch compare to the thirteen inch.
Next step let's get into performance. In Geek-Bench three the 13 inch MacBook Pro had a Single Core Rating of 3475 and a Multicore Rating of 7439. The 15 inch MacBook Pro was really close when it comes to these Single Core Score and that's to be anticipated with the cloak pace however the place you see the BIG difference is, is the Multicore Rating, which was 13138.
So far as the Flash Storage goes, both had been insanely fast. And I will note although that the speeds really is determined by the amount of storage that's in your MacBook Pro. On this case, the thirteen inch was constantly across the thirteen to 1400 MBs per second read and write, whereas the 15 inch MacBook Professional had slightly slower write speeds, when compared to the 13 inch.
Subsequent step in Final Cut Professional 10, I had a three minute 1080p project. What I did was integrate compressor right into a multi-pass H.264 the place I saw 1 minute and fifty five seconds on the thirteen inch MacBook Pro and the 15 inch did that in a minute and 40 seconds.
Subsequent step was a 1080p render test. This really focuses on the graphics. And right here the thirteen inch MacBook accomplished that process in 2 minutes 27 seconds whereas the 15 inch did the identical factor in 1 minute and forty one seconds. So you can see a reasonably large distinction here.
So staying in the graphics division, running Tomb Raider at 1440 x 900, the 13 inch MacBook had 21.four avg fps, whereas the 15 inch more than double, 45.9 avg fps.
Shifting on to the After Effects CC render. The thirteen inch MacBook took 3 minutes and four seconds and then the 15 inch took 2 minutes and 25 seconds. So again, here that's where you possibly can see a BIG distinction between the two.
Now for reference, I'll be comparing the highest end stock 13 inch MacBook Pro in opposition to the bottom end stock 15 inch. What I imply by stock is there's no tweaks & no customization. You can stroll into the Apple Store, BestBuy and even go on Amazon and pick these models up.
So, like I mentioned, essentially the most appealing thing concerning the thirteen inch MacBook Pro 2017 Professional is the Type Factor. It's lighter, it's more compact and subsequently, it is simpler to maneuver around. Then you may have the 15 inch, which is heavier and perhaps a bit of less portable, however you are getting Desktop like Power.
So performance-clever this thirteen inch MacBook Pro has a 2.9GHz Dual Core i5 CPU that turbo boosts as much as 3.3GHz. The 15 inch alternatively has a 2.2GHz Quad Core i7 CPU that turbo boosts all the way as much as 3.4GHz.
So far as the RAM and Storage go the 13 inch has 8GB of RAM, 512GB flash storage, as the 15 inch has double the RAM however half the storage it means can clearly be configured. What cannot be configured though are the Graphics. The thirteen inch has Intel Iris Graphics 6100, then you've got Intel Iris Professional Graphics on the 15 inch.
Now when it comes to these Cores and people Graphics and the way they make difference in performance we'll get to that in a second, however I feel we first need to deal with the Display. Its size, decision and overall screen real estate.
The 13 inch MacBook Professional has a resolution of 2560 x 1600 whereas the 15 inch MacBook Professional has the resolution of 2880 x 1800. And when it comes to what these numbers really means every part is scaled, and if it wasn't Text and everything can be so small, it would be a nightmare to look at. So, the thirteen inch MacBook visually seems to be like 1280 x 800 whereas the 15 inch visually appears like 1440 x 900. Now past that every of these can be configured to provide you more screen real estate.
Subsequent what I did was bump up every MacBook Professional to the following scaling option which gave us more screen real estate. And what I had happening my laptop computer was a Full 1080p window playing in Final Cut Professional 10, and I was able to see how a lot more screen real estate I obtained on the 15 inch compare to the thirteen inch.
Next step let's get into performance. In Geek-Bench three the 13 inch MacBook Pro had a Single Core Rating of 3475 and a Multicore Rating of 7439. The 15 inch MacBook Pro was really close when it comes to these Single Core Score and that's to be anticipated with the cloak pace however the place you see the BIG difference is, is the Multicore Rating, which was 13138.
So far as the Flash Storage goes, both had been insanely fast. And I will note although that the speeds really is determined by the amount of storage that's in your MacBook Pro. On this case, the thirteen inch was constantly across the thirteen to 1400 MBs per second read and write, whereas the 15 inch MacBook Professional had slightly slower write speeds, when compared to the 13 inch.
Subsequent step in Final Cut Professional 10, I had a three minute 1080p project. What I did was integrate compressor right into a multi-pass H.264 the place I saw 1 minute and fifty five seconds on the thirteen inch MacBook Pro and the 15 inch did that in a minute and 40 seconds.
Subsequent step was a 1080p render test. This really focuses on the graphics. And right here the thirteen inch MacBook accomplished that process in 2 minutes 27 seconds whereas the 15 inch did the identical factor in 1 minute and forty one seconds. So you can see a reasonably large distinction here.
So staying in the graphics division, running Tomb Raider at 1440 x 900, the 13 inch MacBook had 21.four avg fps, whereas the 15 inch more than double, 45.9 avg fps.
Shifting on to the After Effects CC render. The thirteen inch MacBook took 3 minutes and four seconds and then the 15 inch took 2 minutes and 25 seconds. So again, here that's where you possibly can see a BIG distinction between the two.